What Does Being Politically Moderate Even Mean?
We can't—and won't—box ourselves into one extreme or the other. We see partial truths on multiple sides of an issue. We're not afraid to say, "Yes, but..." or "I agree with this part, but not that."
In a world increasingly divided by extreme viewpoints, the role of the moderate thinker has never been more crucial.
By embracing nuance, valuing diverse perspectives, and seeking common ground, moderates contribute to a more thoughtful and inclusive political discourse. As we face complex global challenges, the ability to think beyond rigid ideologies and find creative, balanced solutions becomes ever more vital.
As the Roman poet Horace wisely noted, "There is a measure in all things."
In politics and life, moderates remind us of this timeless truth, encouraging us to seek understanding, remain open to new ideas, and work together towards a more harmonious society.
What Does It Mean to Be a Moderate?
True moderates embody a unique blend of openness, nuance, and pragmatism that can bridge divides and foster understanding in our complex society.
But I've heard people say that moderates are just fence-sitters, unable to pick a side.
That couldn't be further from the truth for most of us.
In reality, we are individuals who recognize the complexity of issues and resist the pull of extreme ideologies. As the ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle once said, "The virtue of justice consists in moderation, as regulated by wisdom."
Most moderates don’t lack opinions, rather, they have a fair distribution of opinions on the left and right.
We can't—and won't—box ourselves into one extreme or the other. We see partial truths on multiple sides of an issue. We're not afraid to say, "Yes, but..." or "I agree with this part, but not that part."
Diving Deep vs. Disengaged
There's this idea floating around that moderates are neutral, disengaged, or even cowardly. And sure, some might be.
But for many of us, being moderate is about being MORE engaged, not less.
We're the ones diving deep into issues, looking at them from all angles. We're not satisfied with sound bites or party lines.
We want to understand the full picture, even when it's complicated and requires more effort.
Even when it requires us to push our own edges into uncomfortable territories or question our fears, biases, and belief systems.
If we look disengaged, that’s because the media amplifies the more extreme and radical perspectives that create fear and alarm, rather than giving the MIDDLE A MIC, as they should ;)
The Nuanced Views of Modern Moderates
Nuance is defined as:
Moderates often hold paradoxical views—holding more than one perspective that may appear, to some, to contradict or not fit with one another.
Consider Kim, a small business owner in her 40s. She supports universal healthcare in principle but has concerns about implementation costs and potential impacts on care quality. Her views don't fit neatly into either major political party's platform, exemplifying the nuanced thinking of a moderate.
Take Michael, a veteran who strongly supports Second Amendment rights but also advocates for stricter background checks after witnessing gun violence firsthand. His perspective is shaped by personal experience rather than party loyalty and brings nuance into the conversation.
Another example is Lisa, who was raised in a conservative household but is now living in a diverse urban area. She values both traditional family structures and LGBTQ+ rights, seeing no contradiction in supporting both. Her seemingly paradoxical views more accurately reflect life's complexities rather than require us to choose one value over another.
In environmental policy debates, moderates might advocate for a balanced approach that addresses climate change while also considering economic impacts on communities dependent on fossil fuel industries. This nuanced stance can pave the way for policies that are both effective and politically and economically viable.
We're not flip-flopping or being wishy-washy. We're acknowledging that these issues are multi-faceted, with valid concerns on multiple sides.
Dialectic vs. Debate
It's tempting to villainize those who disagree with us politically, especially when we're overly identified with our opinions and convinced of our own rightness. This tendency is particularly strong when we fear the social consequences of trying to understand the perceived "enemy."
Political moderates often find themselves caught in this dilemma, facing pressure from both sides to choose a camp and demonize the opposition. However, this us-versus-them mentality only deepens divides and hinders productive dialogue.
By resisting the urge to villainize and instead approaching disagreements with openness and empathy, we create opportunities for genuine understanding and bridge-building.
This approach requires courage and a willingness to challenge our own assumptions, but it's essential for fostering a more nuanced and constructive political discourse.
When we disagree respectfully and collaborate, we increase our chances of finding sustainable solutions. We decrease the risk of unintended consequences that come from decisions made on an ideological basis, not considering the long-term impacts or including dissenting viewpoints.
This brings me to the art of dialectic, which I love to discuss. Let's compare dialectic to something we're all familiar with: debate.
In a debate, what's the goal? To win, right? To prove your point and show why the other person is wrong. It's like a verbal boxing match - two sides duking it out until one emerges victorious.
But here's the thing: in real life, issues are rarely that black and white.
And that's where dialectic comes in.
A dialectic is more like a dance than a fight. It's a conversation where both parties are trying to understand each other's viewpoints, get closer to something more true that honors the complexity of the issue, find common ground, and potentially arrive at a new, shared understanding.
In a dialectic:
• We listen to understand, not just to respond
• We're open to changing our minds
• We see disagreement as an opportunity to learn, not a battle to be won
Can you see how this aligns with the moderate way of interacting with the world and ideas?
As moderates, we're not (as) interested in "winning" arguments. We're interested in getting closer to the truth. We know that the best ideas often come from combining different perspectives.
Think about it this way: when you're debating, you're stuck in your position. But when you're engaging in dialectic, you're free to explore, to question, to grow.
It's not about compromising your values. Rather, it’s about honoring that we all value different things. Coming together in a society requires us to honor those differences, expand our understanding, and find unexpected solutions that come from the diversity of our values and thoughts.
So, the next time you find yourself in a heated discussion, try shifting from debate mode to dialectic mode. Ask questions, listen deeply, and be open to new ideas.
That's the moderate way. It's not always easy, and it’s easy to fall back into debate mode. But it's how we build bridges and find sustainable and equanimous solutions.
So, are You a Moderate?
If you're nodding along, thinking, "Yes! This is me!" then welcome to Give the Middle a Mic, a home for moderates.
We might not have flashy slogans or extreme positions, but we have something powerful—the ability to see nuance, allow complexity, seek truth and wholeness, and build bridges in a world that desperately needs them.
So the next time someone tries to tell you that being moderate means being wishy-washy or disengaged, you tell them this:
Being moderate means being
brave enough to embrace complexity,
courageous enough to navigate outside of well-defined ideologies,
curious enough to seek out opposing viewpoints,
engaged enough to look beyond party lines, and
committed enough to seek understanding, even - especially - when we disagree.
Because, at the end of the day, that's how real, lasting change happens.
Not through force or executive orders but through open minds, bravery, mutual respect, understanding, and collaboration.
Thanks for being here!
If you’d like to support my work, here are some suggestions:
‘Hearting’ this post so others are encouraged to read it
Leaving a comment
Restacking if you think others would benefit
Sharing via email or on social media
Taking out a paid subscription which directly supports my writing :)